THIS WEEK IN SACRAMENTO
Prepared by
Norwood & Associates
September 10, 2003
SPECIAL
WORKERS' COMPENSATION
INSURANCE
REPORT
1.
Deal Reached on Workers' Compensation Insurance Reform
The
four Democrats on the
workers' compensation
insurance conference
committee inked
their names
to a conference
report, AB 227 (Vargas) and SB 228 (Alarcon),
as a Tuesday midnight
deadline
approached.
The two Republicans
on the committee
abstained, signaling the
view of the Republican
caucus and many in the business
community the deal
hashed out by various Democratic
factions was a half-loaf and better
than nothing. The
bill now goes before
the Assembly
and Senate
for an up or down vote before
the legislative
session ends
this Friday. Governor
Gray Davis announced today he
would sign the bill if it reaches
his desk.
- Summary of the Conference Committee Report
The
highlights
of the reform
bill are as follows:
·
Establishes a fee
schedule for
outpatient surgery
centers at
120% of Medi-Cal.
·
Reduces
medical provider
rates by 5% unless
at or below Medi-Cal
rates.
·
Pharmacy services
limited to 100% of Medi-Cal.
·
Limits chiropractic and physical therapy
visits to 24 visits per claim.
·
Replaces
the existing
vocational rehabilitation program which provided
benefits
ranging from $10,000-16,000 with and educational
voucher worth $4,000-$10,000 depending
on the level
of disability and whether
modified work is offered. No more than
10% of the voucher
can be used
for vocational or return to work counseling.
·
Establishes
utilization review,
independent
review and second
opinion processes
to reduce the
cost and delay of medical
care disputes.
·
Eliminates the
treating physician's presumption
for injuries which occurred
between
1994 and 2003 (the presumption
was eliminated
for all future claims as part of last year's
$3.5 billion benefit
increase
bill.) The
presumption still applies
to pre-designated
physicians, a significant loophole.
·
Requires
employers,
who funded 20% of the
administration of the workers'
compensation insurance
system, to fund 100% of the
system.
This is an additional $80 million employers
will have to pay, but will allow implementation
of administrative reforms
that were
stalled because
of lack of funding.
·
Exempts CIGA
from paying penalties
assessed
against insurers who later
became insolvent.
·
Authorizes up
to $1.5 billion in bonds to be issued
on behalf of CIGA to resolve
expected
short-term cash flow problems
due to the
high number of insolvencies.
·
Exempts the
State Compensation
Insurance Fund from hiring freezes.
·
Limits litigation by allowing labor unions and
management to
agree on alternative
dispute resolution
procedures.
·
Reduces
the time for
insurers to pay medical
bills from 60 days to 45 days and increases
penalties for
late payments.
·
Requires
the Insurance
Commissioner to take
into account the bill's reforms
when approving advisory pure
premium rates
and requires
the WCIRB to determine
the cost savings
of the reforms. Insurers
would be required
to certify their
rates reflect
those cost savings.
·
Requires
CHSWC to study the feasibility
of imposing a minimum rate law to be
phased in over
five years.
- Estimated Cost Savings
Depends
who you talk to. In a press
conference
this morning, Insurance Commissioner
John Garamendi said he
believed
the bill, once
fully implemented
would achieve
between
$5-6 billion in annual savings and one time
savings of $5.3 billion. He
said his actuaries were
conservative
in developing
the estimates,
and he believes
the ultimate
savings will be closer
to $6 billion.
These
numbers are
about what Assembly Insurance
Committee
Chairman Juan Vargas all along said was his goal. The savings
are more than
the $2-3 billion some
liberal Democrats
wanted, and far short of the
$11 billion set by Republicans.
The
Commissioner estimated
the bill's reforms
would eliminate
the need
for the proposed
12.7% increase
in the advisory pure
premium rate effective
January 1, 2026. He said he
was "comfortable" the
reforms would also roll back the
7% increase
which was effective
July 1, 2026, and held
out hope for further
cutbacks once the
hard to "score" reforms
such as utilization review
and alternative
dispute resolution
kicked in.
The
Commissioner said the
one time
savings of $5.3 billion would not be immediately
reflected
in premiums, but would shore
up the health
of insurers, especially
the State
Fund. He
did note, however,
as insurers restored
their health,
that would have an impact on premiums. It would also help
bring stability to the marketplace
and encourage
other insurers
to come to California.
Republicans,
however, immediately
questioned the
numbers.
They have
always cautioned that avoiding major changes
would result in piece-meal
reforms that were
little more
than window dressing. They noted
the WCIRB has only identified
$2.5 billion of savings. The
WCIRB, however,
said it cannot estimate
savings for many of the proposals because
specific language
was only released
before the
hearing last night. They are
now working on updating their estimated
cost savings.
They continue
to caution, however,
that many of the cost savings
will be difficult, if not impossible,
to score because
their impact on utilization is unknown.
- Winners and Losers
The
workers' compensation
insurance crisis became
one of the
most hotly contested
issues this year. California's
workers' compensation
insurance system
is the most expensive
in the nation, and yet
provides some
of the lowest
benefits, a
clear indication lots of money
is going to third parties. These
various interest
groups spent enormous
amounts of time and effort
protecting their
piece of the
pie and trying to shift the
focus of cost-cutting efforts to others. Now the deal
is done, it is possible
to tally up this year's winners
and losers in the
game of workers'
compensation insurance
reform.
1.
Winners
·
Insurance Agents
& Brokers: A proposal to cap insurance
agent broker
commissions was taken off the
table.
Agents and brokers
were the
only major group that escaped
a "haircut" in the bill. Agents and
brokers, however,
argued they were
the first group to take
a haircut when the
Commissioner ordered
the State
Fund to lower commission rates,
with the rest
of the market
following in driving commissions down.
·
Insurers: Despite
plenty of rhetoric,
the committee
ultimately rejected
a statutory premium rollback, premium
cap or rate regulation.
·
Labor: Preserved
the $3.5 billion benefit
increase they
won last year by sponsoring the
strict fee
schedule on
outpatient surgery
centers that
was ultimately adopted
and is expected
to save about $932 million annually.
·
CIGA: Got
the $1.5 billion bonding authority they
needed
to resolve their
short-term cash flow problems
caused by the
latest rash of insolvencies
without having to increase
the 2% assessment. Were
also exempted
from outrageous penalties
for technical violations made
by insurers that later
became the
responsibility of CIGA. These
penalties
amount to millions of dollars.
·
Attorneys:
Insurers are
assessed late
penalties on
the entire
benefit award
even though
only one payment
is late.
A proposal to assess the
penalty against just the
late payment,
and not the entire
award, was changed at the
last minute to apply only to CIGA, not all
insurers.
These
penalties
amount to millions of dollars and are a huge
profit center
for attorneys.
Attorneys were
also able to keep
litigation alive and well
in the system
by keeping a
loophole that provides
a treating physician a presumption
of correctness
if the physician is predesignated.
·
Insurance
Commissioner John Garamendi:
As of only a couple of days ago, the
conference
committee appeared
deadlocked. By all accounts, the
Insurance Commissioner
was the one
who kept legislators'
feet to the
fire and helped
broker the
final deal.
He reportedly
was calling members
as the deal
was falling apart from a hospital hallway while
attending to an ill family member. He personally
drafted language,
and promised to put his credibility
on the line
by vouching for the $5-6 billion in
savings. In return,
the committee
nixed a proposal to transfer
the DOI's workers'
compensation insurance
fraud money and staff to the
Attorney General.
2.
Losers
·
Outpatient Surgery
Centers: These
centers are
the only providers
not subject
to a fee schedule,
and costs naturally have been
going through the roof. The original
proposal was to establish a fee
schedule at
120% of Medi-Cal, but everyone
expected
that was just an opening negotiating
number.
The surgery
centers were
pushing for 165% of Medi-Cal, and it appeared
a compromise was in the
works to settle
at 150%. The
surgery centers,
however, over-played
their hand by involving Assembly
Speaker Herb
Wesson.
In the end,
he couldn't protect
them, and they
got stuck with 120%.
·
Speaker
Herb Wesson:
The Speaker
is termed out
next year,
and has wanted to stay on as Speaker
instead of allowing for a transition ahead
of next year's
elections. There
is a succession battle
underway among the
majority Democrats who have
enough votes
to elect the
Speaker. Many moderate
Democrats, members
of the Latino caucus, have
been unhappy
with the Speaker's
leadership
and are angling to replace
him with one of their
own. When
the Speaker
tried to stop a drastic fee
schedule from
being imposed
on the outpatient
surgery centers,
several members
of the conference
committee refused
to go along and were
willing to close down the
conference
committee
without a reform bill. The Speaker,
faced with panicking members
who would have faced
angry voters, caved
rather than be
ousted by members
of his caucus who wanted a reform
bill at any cost.
·
Vocation Rehabilitation
Providers: The
vocational rehabilitation mandate
has been eliminated
in favor of providing $4,000-$10,000, depending
on the level
of disability, for education. Counseling fees
are limited
to 10% of this amount.
·
SCIF:
While the
State Fund received
an exemption
from the hiring freeze,
they were
unable to dump the
Risk Based Capital standards imposed
last year and weren't
able to get
out from under the
Commissioner's regulatory
thumb.
3.
Draw
·
Chiropractors:
An injured worker
who is treated
by a chiropractor receives
an average of
34 treatments,
more than twice
the national average. The original
proposal was to cap visits at 15. The
deal caps visits at 24. The cap, however,
is not "hard." A physician can
approve additional visits. In addition, there
is a fear that chiropractors will now routinely
increase the
number of treatments
to the cap of 24. Thus, the ceiling
could become
the floor.
It could have been
much worse for the
chiros.
- 2004 Landscape
The
old saw is that workers' compensation
insurance "reform"
only happens once
a decade. However,
no one is crowing this reform
package solves
the crisis.
The most optimistic estimates
have these
reforms returning
rates to the
super-inflated
levels of last
summer, a still deplorable
situation. Even
the bill's most ardent
supporters indicated
further reforms
would be necessary
in the year's
to come.
Insurance
Commissioner John Garamendi
said it took many years of inattention
to get to where
we are today,
and it will take many more
years to get
the system
back in shape.
Assemblyman Juan Vargas said this bill
was only a first, while significant, step. He noted
after the
1993 reforms, everyone
let their
guard down thinking they had fixed
the system.
Senator
Charles Poochigian, who did not vote
for the conference
report and did not attend
the press conference
announcing the deal,
instead issued
a list of reforms that still
needed
to be acted
on:
·
Mandated objective
medical findings to determine
permanent
disability.
·
Rationalize the
permanent
disability rating system by infusing fairness,
consistency and objectivity.
·
Provide the
employer the
right to choose the
medical provider
for 365 days, rather than 30 days.
·
Correct the
definition of what it means
to "cure and relieve"
injured employees
so that it is evidence-based.
·
Suspend the
COLA growth included in temporary
disability, beginning in 2006.
·
Curtail the
abuse of stress
claims.
·
Eliminate
non-work related
injuries from the
system (establish
a predominate
cause standard.)
·
Curb litigation costs.
·
Require
apportionment when
injury is to the same
part of the body.
·
Prohibit prisoners
from receiving
workers' compensation.
In addition to further
legislation, all eyes
will be on how insurers
respond to the
reforms.
In the words of the
Insurance Commissioner,
a "bright light" will be focused
on insurers next
year.
While insurers
escaped rate
regulation and re-imposition
of the minimum rate
law, the Legislature
is definitely
headed that
direction unless
premiums start to fall.
* * *
© Copyright 2003 by
Norwood & Associates
[email protected]